Watch now | Republican Warns Real ID Is Being Used to 'Control' Americans With State-to-State Passports, just as Joe Biden did Covid Vaccine Passports ft The "Shoe Bomber" was trying to set-off C4 with matches.
You seem to be throwing everything and the kitchen sink at 9/11, so let me give you some reading to do, in order for you to lessen up your muddle up...
Why Ace Baker's Video Fakery Compositing Theory Is Invalid
Independent Analysis of Ace Baker's Video Compositing Theory
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Good work. But, in my work, I identify the actual weapons capable of dustifying buildings. Judy Wood does not. In regard to Ace Baker's video analysis, until you have proof that an aluminum plan can penetrate 1 1/2" of structural steel, without slowing down, breaking apart and leaving no signs of a plane in the holes of the WTC, then video fakery or pre-planted explosives are the only logical alternatives. I would suggest you test out a machine gun with aluminum bullets at 1000 m/s vs structural steel. I will predict that the aluminum bullets would simply impact on the surface with zero penetration.
I suggest that you speak with Dr Judy Wood and Dr Morgan Reynolds, then they will tell you, like they did me, that Ace Baker was a paid infiltrator and his "American Psy-Opera" was exactly that, a paid for PSYOP, to muddle up the waters, regarding Dr Wood's evidence of DEW.
He inserted the bullshit narrative of mini or buried nukes, most probably due to Fetzer, and his CGI plane narratives are absolute bullshit - I suggest the article I shared get read.
Then on the planes - Why was the CGI narrative implanted into the narratives?
To suppress the work of Dr Morgan Reynolds, pointing out nothing solid hit those buildings or crashed at Shanksville or the PentaCON.
So what did people see, take pictures of and film?
Well, it was 3D Volumetric Projection Technology. So, my suggestion to you is;
Of course the demolitions of 2001 were done differently than the failed truck bomb of 1993. These demos were to appear that they were caused by light (thin-skinned) hyper-fast aluminum airplanes. [Their simulated speed was such that had it been real they would have vibrated and broken up in flight.]
This, however, was a carefully crafted illusion. [See original post.]
You seem to be throwing everything and the kitchen sink at 9/11, so let me give you some reading to do, in order for you to lessen up your muddle up...
Why Ace Baker's Video Fakery Compositing Theory Is Invalid
Independent Analysis of Ace Baker's Video Compositing Theory
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/why-ace-bakers-video-fakery-compositing
9/11 Planes: 3D VIPT vs Video Fakery and CGI
Is seeing believing, or believing seeing on 9/11?
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/911-planes-3d-volumetric-image-projection
Controlled Demolition Expert Speaks Out!
What we saw on 9/11 was not due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/controlled-demolition-expert-speaks
Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers
Showing you just how easily people are duped, who don't know any better
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/myanmar-provides-a-911-lesson-for
The 9/11 Building 7 HOAX
Building 7 did NOT go down to fire or explosives.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-building-7-hoax-video-of-2011
WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001?
The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on…
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/what-exactly-happened-to-all-7-buildings
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf
The molecular dissociation of the thermite & nuke theories
People are so easily led by perceived "experts".
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
Good work. But, in my work, I identify the actual weapons capable of dustifying buildings. Judy Wood does not. In regard to Ace Baker's video analysis, until you have proof that an aluminum plan can penetrate 1 1/2" of structural steel, without slowing down, breaking apart and leaving no signs of a plane in the holes of the WTC, then video fakery or pre-planted explosives are the only logical alternatives. I would suggest you test out a machine gun with aluminum bullets at 1000 m/s vs structural steel. I will predict that the aluminum bullets would simply impact on the surface with zero penetration.
I had already quit AE911Truth's investigation team for the same reason, prior to Abraham releasing his confrontation to Richard Gage. Understanding the 9/11 EVIDENCE https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
I suggest that you speak with Dr Judy Wood and Dr Morgan Reynolds, then they will tell you, like they did me, that Ace Baker was a paid infiltrator and his "American Psy-Opera" was exactly that, a paid for PSYOP, to muddle up the waters, regarding Dr Wood's evidence of DEW.
He inserted the bullshit narrative of mini or buried nukes, most probably due to Fetzer, and his CGI plane narratives are absolute bullshit - I suggest the article I shared get read.
Then on the planes - Why was the CGI narrative implanted into the narratives?
To suppress the work of Dr Morgan Reynolds, pointing out nothing solid hit those buildings or crashed at Shanksville or the PentaCON.
So what did people see, take pictures of and film?
Well, it was 3D Volumetric Projection Technology. So, my suggestion to you is;
Study the substack of 9/11 Planes Research: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/
9/11 Planes: 3D VIPT vs Video Fakery and CGI
Is seeing believing, or believing seeing on 9/11?
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/911-planes-3d-volumetric-image-projection
9/11 Planes Research podcast with Jerm Warfare: https://rumble.com/v646fsm-jerm-warfare-talks-to-911-planes-research.html
Listen to our podcast: 9/11 Truth Movement Planes Propaganda - Podcast - 7th March 2025
When the 9/11 truther planes narratives do not fly
Podcast: https://rumble.com/v6q6eo8-when-the-911-truther-plane-narratives-do-not-fly.html
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
Lastly, Abraham and I know each other well and I've exposed Gage and the rest of the 9/11 "truther" celebrities even better than Abraham did in 2011.
The molecular dissociation of the thermite & nuke theories
People are so easily led by perceived "experts".
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite
You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf
Please send me the evidence of a plane at Shankesville or the plane at the Pentagon. Then, we'll take a look at your evidence of a plane at the WTC.
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
Article & Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-suspension-of-newtonian-physics
The Fantasy Flights on 9/11
One of the biggest hurdles for 9/11 truth seekers and normies
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-fantasy-flights-on-911
The 9/11 Hoodwink at Shanksville, PA
No Jet Fuel, or a plane at the Flight 93 Crash Site
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/hoodwinked-at-shanksville-on-911
The PentaCon on 9/11
When a missile AND a plane did not hit a target
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-pentacon-on-911
Poem: Ghosts In The Flight - Don't believe your eyes
Article: https://robdubya.substack.com/p/poem-ghosts-in-the-flight
Cato Institute senior fellow Patrick Eddington said, "I’m not aware of a single post-9/11 instance of an alleged or actual terrorist being apprehended, much less successfully boarding an airliner, with false ID credentials – which is the entire-stated rationale for REAL ID." https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/someone-lied-republicans-break-rank-over-real-id/ss-AA1DDoEP
Except for initial reports, the 9-11 story is missing the tail #s.
While researching for 9-11 Mysteries, I found at least two tail #s flying.
Thus:
No planes crashed,
No passengers (none listed in SSDI),
No hijackers.
Real pre-planted explosives.
Plane & Crash images CGI.
No pre-planted exposives could take-down the WTC in 10 seconds. The only proposed explosives were designed to appear as-if they were created by an airplane. The first attack in 1993 used an entire truck load of explosives and couldn't even dislodge 1 support beam. https://assets3.cbsnewsstatic.com/hub/i/r/2013/02/26/c40408ae-c446-11e2-a43e-02911869d855/thumbnail/1200x630/19edc64b9a780887942965a129e387e3/wtc_51957273.jpg
Of course the demolitions of 2001 were done differently than the failed truck bomb of 1993. These demos were to appear that they were caused by light (thin-skinned) hyper-fast aluminum airplanes. [Their simulated speed was such that had it been real they would have vibrated and broken up in flight.]
This, however, was a carefully crafted illusion. [See original post.]
After the dust settled and some rubble was cleared in ‘01 – ‘02 I remember seeing pictures of the towers basements with all the vertical beams cut on diagonals [I had pictures but can’t find now] except (https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD0479244 see “Anglecut” image: (https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/kn0563zggqk55y3w573hu/anglecutwitharrow2.jpg?rlkey=xmsc3oal2608l4hqzluo8qsxj&st=0nxx884i&dl=0 which shows one). That’s why the radio mast at the top of WTC-1 dropping was the first external evidence of that tower’s core columns had been cut. (See “shaking” video https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/7t7y5w53fgri3prcpzbfg/Shaking-before-WTC-1-collapse.mpg?rlkey=y3b5c0fqkbnci0yi5kj5pg742&st=wipdgtq5&dl=.) That core-column cutting – into transportable lengths [how convenient!] forced the tower to collapse at free-fall speed onto its footprint.
After the “bathtub” below the WTC towers was emptied of rubble, at the bottom the granite was photographed looking up at sky and surrounding buildings. That a large volume of the granite rock was melted is clear. (See “Signs” image https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ktz30v0n1tuw6e70av1cn/Signs-of-a-nuclear-event.jpg?rlkey=k9mbgpm0rrbl7laamcghrhcgm&st=lbs6862h&dl=0 .) Thus, stories from 9-11+ emergency crews seeing molten lava flowing were true. Also on that morning some people commented that the dust clouts were hot.
The airplanes, passengers, and hijackers [fictitious as they all were] were entirely a distraction from the demolitions. See my original post.