Legal Cases citing Nuremberg Codex for Covid-19 Measures https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-trials-2-0/f/nurembergtrialsnet---legal-cases-citing-nuremberg-for-covid-19 -- The Hague District Court called the curfew a "far-reaching violation of the right to freedom of movement and privacy" that also indirectly curtails the rights of freedom of assembly and demonstration. https://apnews.com/article/world-news-netherlands-coronavirus-pandemic-the-hague-92cf76ec9e318b6b5bd69954e2992b72/
On March 24th 2021 Fact Check-International Criminal Court has yet to assess Israeli anti-vaxxers submit ethics complaint to International Criminal Court citing Nuremberg Code. https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-icc-israel-covid/fact-check-international-criminal-court-has-yet-to-assess-merit-of-a-claim-regarding-israels-covid-19-vaccination-programme-idUSL1N2LM2FS
ICC Rome Statute: (see S 7on Page 10) https://www.icc-cpi.int/Publications/Rome-Statute.pdf -- Amnesty International report on Torture, 1976: https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/204000/act400011975eng.pdf
Additionally, the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, Article 6 requires consent and a thorough understanding of the ingredients in the vaccines. http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
April 17th 2021 Repealed Genocide Act Precludes Indicting UK Government Officers To International Criminal Court https://www.thebernician.net/repealed-genocide-act-precludes-indicting-uk-government-officers-to-icc/
Hitler's 4th Reich "Fact-Checkers" in response to Nuremberg Trials 2.0: June 16th 2021 British barrister Karim Khan sworn in as new ICC chief prosecutor https://www.dw.com/en/karim-khan-sworn-in-as-new-icc-chief-prosecutor/a-57916216
June 15th 2021 A federal judge over the weekend dismissed a lawsuit brought by 117 employees of a Houston-based hospital system, who, among other things, claimed that the hospital’s requirement that staff be vaccinated against COVID-19 was akin to medical atrocities carried out by Nazis. Judge Hughes noted that the federal provision they referenced applies to governments, not private employers, and that their claims “misrepresented the facts.” Judge Hughes noted that “the hospital’s employees are not participants in a human trial.” https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/06/judge-tosses-reprehensible-lawsuit-comparing-covid-vaccine-to-nazi-atrocities/
June 10th 2021 Misleading posts about Nuremberg trials misuse post-World War II photo https://factcheck.afp.com/misleading-posts-about-nuremberg-trials-misuse-post-world-war-ii-photo -- Only one member of the media was convicted and hanged during the Nuremberg trials, Richard Wilson, Professor of Anthropology and Law at the University of Connecticut, told AFP on June 11, 2021.
June 4th 2021 No, COVID vaccine mandates don’t violate the Nuremberg code https://www.lowellsun.com/2021/06/04/no-covid-vaccine-mandates-dont-violate-the-nuremberg-code/
June 2nd 2021 No, Covid Vaccine Mandates Don’t Violate the Nuremberg Code https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-06-02/texas-hospital-s-covid-vaccine-mandate-doesn-t-violate-nuremberg-code
May 29th 2021 117 staffers sue over Houston hospital’s vaccine mandate, saying they don’t want to be ‘guinea pigs’ https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/05/29/texas-hospital-vaccine-lawsuit/
May 25th 2021 Does COVID-19 vaccine rollout violate Nuremberg Code that protects against coercion of medical-experiment subjects? https://www.oregonlive.com/coronavirus/2021/05/does-covid-19-vaccine-rollout-violate-nuremberg-code-that-protects-against-coercion-of-medical-experiment-subjects.html
November 14th 2022 Reiner Fuellmich Covid ICIC “International Crimes Investigative Committee” https://t.me/ICICommittee
February 5th 2022 Reiner Fuellmich's Corona Investigation Committee Public Grand Jury Hearings Days 1-7 | OPENING STATEMENTS | YouTube
Reiner Fuellmich's Crimes Against Humanity Tour (crimesagainsthumanitytour.com) w/ Public Grand Jury Hearings Crimes Against Humanity Tour Fuellmich Grand Jury + Fauci Missing (nurembergtrials.net). Logistic support is provided to the proceedings by the Berlin Corona Investigative Committee: website (German) or website (English). Grand Jury’s website: www.grand-jury.net
June 28th 2021 Nuremberg Code Point 1 on Informed Consent by Chief Justice
June 26th 2021 10 Points of the Nuremberg Codex Explained by Chief Justice
June 25th 2021 Legal Cases citing Nuremberg for Covid-19 by Chief Justice
June 12th 2021 100 Questions for Fauci & Gates on Nuremberg Code by Chief Justice
APRIL 8TH 2021 NUREMBERG TRIAL SUBPOENA'S BEGIN FOR 4TH REICH MEMBERS AND CONSPIRATORS FOR COVID HOAX
President Biden, facing a slowing rate of vaccinations and a hope for near normalcy by Independence Day, said the government would shift from mass vaccination sites to local settings. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/04/us/politics/biden-vaccination-strategy.html
April 7th 2021 The Significance of the Nuremberg Code: The Universal Right of Informed Consent to Medical Interventions by ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION https://ahrp.org/the-significance-of-the-nuremberg-code/
The Nuremberg Code provides legal justification to litigate violations of informed consent. The first and foremost principle is unequivocal: "The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential". The United States Military Tribunal established the Nuremberg Code as a standard against which applies to all citizens soldiers as well as civilians." "the universally accepted norm in customary international law regarding nonconsensual medical experimentation." The 4thReich members and their aiders and abettors are responsible, whether they know it or not, violating the Nuremberg Code as a Crime Against Humanity.
1) "a surgeon who performs an operation without his patient's consent commits an assault for which he is liable in damages."
2) "responsibility for violations of informed consent rests upon individual doctors, government officials and their aiders and abettors each of who can be prosecuted for crimes against humanity"
3) "any compelled intrusion into the human body implicates significant, constitutionally protected privacy interests
4) "All actors, however, are bound by the Nuremberg Code"
"Of special interest to this Court, the Nuremberg Code, at least in significant part, was the result of legal thought and legal principles, as opposed to medical or scientific principles, and thus should be the preferred standard for assessing the legality of scientific research on human subjects. Under it, duties to research subjects arise. The Nuremberg code [i]s a summary of the legal requirements for experimentation on humans The Code requires that the informed, voluntary, competent, and understanding consent of the research subject be obtained. Although this principle is placed first in the Code's ten points, the other nine points must be satisfied before it is even appropriate to ask the subject to consent. The Nuremberg Code is the 'most complete and authoritative statement of the law of informed consent to human experimentation.' It is also 'part of international common law and may be applied, in both civil and criminal cases, by state, federal and municipal courts in the United States."
The Nuremberg Code prohibits human experimentation of the very kind being endorsed and defended by the EMA. Even under the terms of their own original FDA authorization, COVID-19 vaccines are deemed "investigational" and their recipients "human subjects", who are, by definition, entitled to informed consent. Misleading populations into accepting investigational agents such as the gene-based COVID-19 "vaccines", or coercing them through "vaccine passports", constitutes clear and egregious violations of the Nuremberg Code. The Nuremberg Code mandates voluntary informed consent "without the intervention of any element of #force, #fraud, #deceit [or] #duress". In other words, citizens have the right under the Nuremberg Code and related protections not to be subject involuntarily to medical experiments. It is clear that these experimental agents should be CONTRA-INDICATED in individuals not at elevated risk of serious illness & death if infected by SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, the use of the experimental agents must also be withheld in the elderly population until a risk-benefit assessment has been properly conducted. In any event, the vaccine label must be revised to reflect the recently emerged serious adverse events addressed here.
We remind the EMA that Nuremberg violations constitute crimes against humanity under the Geneva Convention. Crimes against humanity are deemed "the worst atrocities known to mankind", and are prosecuted under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
Notice to aiders and abettors:
For the avoidance of doubt, if your regulatory body does not immediately suspend its "emergency" recommendation of potentially dangerous inadequately tested gene-based "vaccines", while the matters which we have highlighted to you are properly investigated, we hereby put the European Medicines Agency on notice of being complicit in medical experimentation, in violation of the Nuremberg Code, which thereby constitutes the commission of crimes against humanity. Furthermore, it is your indirigible duty as a regulatory body to ensure that all doctors worldwide are advised that they are taking part in medical experimentation via "vaccination" programmes, whether wittingly or unwittingly, with all the legal and ethical obligations that such involvement entails.
Cases in Point: The case involved Pfizer which conducted an unapproved, trial of its experimental antibiotic, Trovan on children in Nigeria. The court found Pfizer guilty. -- Rabi Abdullahi, et al. v. Pfizer, Inc., 562 F.3d (2d Cir. 2009)
1) "Among the nonconsensual experiments that the tribunal cited as a basis for their convictions were the testing of drugs for immunization against malaria, epidemic jaundice, typhus, smallpox and cholera. Seven of the convicted doctors were sentenced to death and the remaining eight were sentenced to varying terms of imprisonment. The American tribunal's conclusion that action that contravened the Nuremberg Code's first principle constituted a crime against humanity is a lucid indication of the international legal significance of the prohibition on nonconsensual medical experimentation."
Telford Taylor explained,"Nuremberg was based on enduring [legal] principles and not on temporary political expedients, and this fundamental point is apparent from the reaffirmation of the Nuremberg principles in Control Council Law No. 10, and their application and refinement in the 12 judgments rendered under that law during the 3-year period, 1947 to 1949."
Share this post